Knowing What AI Agents to Build

How to Know What Kind of AI Agent to Build

One of the best ways to know what kind of AI Agent to build for your customers and your specific industry is by looking at what’s already working. What does success look like for the leading companies?

For example, I’m using OpenAI’s Codex (their programming AI Agent). My first experiment is telling it to help me remember and explain a Python script I wrote a while ago.

“Explain what gen-know-what-you-own.py does.”

It “thought” for 19 seconds and then broke its answer down into three logical sections:

  • Script Flow
  • Prompt & Model Call
  • Persistence

That’s a perfectly reasonable and structured way to respond to my fuzzy, high-level request. It totally makes sense when explaining code layout.

Traditionally, this happens all the time on programming teams. Senior programmers invest a lot of time onboarding junior programmers by walking them through the existing codebase.

Now imagine how a similar AI Agent might help in your domain:

  • “Explain this bank mortgage.”
  • “Explain this credit card statement.”
  • “Explain this recipe.”
  • “Explain this song.”

Think about where an AI Agent like that could accelerate your teammates and customers. Reducing initial friction, cognitive load, manual chores, and wasted time can be a massive win!

Start with People, Not Technology

You know you want to build an AI Agent, but you don’t exactly know what to build — or worse, how to get started. It’s a common problem I routinely hear when talking to execs at companies.

One of the best ways to get started isn’t with the tech. Start with the people. Look and listen to find their problems. What’s their moment of friction? Where do people pause, get stuck, or burn time trying to understand something new, complex, or intimidating?

A highly practical example is OpenAI’s Codex programming agent. I can request it to “explain what gen-know-what-you-own.py does.”

It’ll “think” for a brief time, then respond with a clean, structured explanation including:

  • Program Flow
  • Gen AI Prompt & Model Call
  • Data Persistence

But that pattern isn’t unique to programming. Explaining complex things clearly is a universal need. Imagine an AI Agent designed to do something similar to what Codex does for programmers, but in other domains.

Example: Bank Mortgage

  • Break down loan terms, interest rates, payment schedules, and hidden fees.
  • Translate jargon into plain language.
  • Surface what matters most to the borrower’s bottom line.

Example: Credit Card Statement

  • Identify categories of spending.
  • Highlight interest charges or upcoming due dates.
  • Show trends over time for better purchase decision-making.

Example: Recipe

  • Clarify the prep flow and cooking timeline.
  • Surface required techniques and substitutions.
  • Adapt to dietary or equipment constraints in real time.

Example: Song

  • Break down its structure like verse, chorus, bridge.
  • Identify key themes, instrumentation, and mood.
  • Connect it to cultural or genre context.

The valuable pattern is the same:

  • Identify a confusing moment
  • Structure it into an explainable flow
  • Deliver clarity, not just answers

This is where AI Agents shine — not by replacing human expertise, but by making complexity seem simpler.

“What can AI do?” is a perfectly fine way to start thinking about product design opportunities. Ultimately, we want to unlock the question, “Where is the economic value of applied AI?”

From Designing to Building AI Agents

We're clearly imagining how AI Agents can explain complex things clearly. By looking at the popular Codex agent that helps programmers, the lessons learned may be applied far beyond programming. Then, we imagined what those moments could look like across different industries.

At some point, we need to shift from thinking about design to actually building. You need to do the thing.

Application architects, the way I see it, have a choice between two significant directions:

  • No-code builders
  • Full-code tech stacks

No-Code Builders

Full-Code Tech Stacks

The next step is to choose 1–2 focused use-cases where we can actually bring this idea to life. Think of something small enough to ship quickly, but meaningful enough to teach us something real.

A strong pilot candidate has:

  • A clear, high-friction “explain this” moment
  • A structured way an agent can respond
  • Real user or teammate pain it can ease

The point is, I’m not worried about designing the perfect AI Agent from the start. Discover the right starting place and build the most helpful thing in the simplest way possible.

Test, Learn, and Iterate

UXers and Product Managers, over the next weeks, surface three strong candidate use cases to evaluate as a potential AI Agent pilot. Try to plan and build quickly.

Treat everything as an experiment. Test-and-learn with real users. Watch carefully, and listen intently. Take feedback and use it to directly inform your development roadmap.

As you build, remember:

The goal isn’t just building capabilities — it’s creating a smooth, trustworthy user experience.

Share on X (Twitter) ➚

Ending logo Mark for this article